Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d310f5e24e88e

Jump to content

Talk:Emma Nutt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Belbury in topic Infobox image
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Nutt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2018

[edit]

Change Emma Nutt's birth year from 1860 to 1848. Supported by her inclusion in Perry, Washington, Maine's 1860 and 1870 Census. 2601:602:9C01:1DEF:5488:86:BE8C:B3E9 (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@FlightTime: As the IP user states, the 1860 birth year definitely does seem to be wrong based on census records; unfortunately the same records weren't consistent on her birth year. In the 1880 census, Emma Nutt was living in the household of her father, George and Matilda Nutt, and is listed as being born in 1848. In the 1900 census, Emma was living with her parents and her sister's family (the Everts), and was listed as being born in 1851. In the 1910 census, she was living with her sister and elderly mother, and is back to being listed as born in 1848. So, the census records are inconclusive (although none of them agree with a year of 1860), and they are primary sources anyway. As far as secondary sources, I did find this one from People's World, which gives a birth year of 1851, but I am not sure if it qualifies as a reliable source or not, what do you think? PohranicniStraze (talk) 03:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@PohranicniStraze: I have no idea, if you feel good about it, action the request. I denied it because because the IP did not provide a source, not because I thought they were wrong. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:42, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Emma Nutt death date

[edit]

According to a front-page obituary "First Woman Phone Operator Here Dies" (Boston Globe, 05 June 1926), Emma Nutt died on 04 June 1926 at her home in Cambridge, Mass. She was to be buried 06 June 1926 in Wyoming Cemetery, Melrose, Mass. HummingbirdMoth (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

[sic] on despatch

[edit]

Despatch appears on wiktionary as a variant of dispatch, and appears in The Pilgrim's Progress. The [sic] makes it sound like some naïve parochialism. 172.92.85.248 (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Emma Nutt DOB

[edit]

I added a {{Disputed inline}} template as the linked source (a 1900 US Census scan) indicates that Emma Nutt was born in 1851. However, the Wikipedia article currently lists "July 1860" as her DOB. Which is correct? In fact, are we even sure the Emma Nutt from the 1900 Census is the same Emma Nutt as this article? --Jnglmpera (talk) 04:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clarify picture source in caption

[edit]

This picture https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/Emma_and_shiela_nutt_1878-264x201.jpg/250px-Emma_and_shiela_nutt_1878-264x201.jpg is often reposted with no disclaimer that it is not an original 1878 photo. How about changing the caption from "This scene from "Bold Experiment – the Telephone Story"," to "This reenactment from 1958's "Bold Experiment – the Telephone Story"," [source for date - caption under picture at https://www.telcomhistory.org/archivesOnlinePhotos.html] Teal4two (talk) 17:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Came here to the talk page to discuss this problem. First of all, what the heck is the "Bold Experiment – the Telephone Story" (1958)? It appears to be a historical reenactment of some kind? A tableau vivant? This is very odd to me. Viriditas (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image

[edit]

Following on from the previous section, how much reason do we have to believe that File:Emma Nutt circa 1878-1900.jpg is also an original 19th century photo of Nutt?

The Commons description of where this image came from is vague (Photographer, source and date unknown) and this particular file was apparently taken from ZoomInfo, a possibly WP:USERGEN website that appears to have been a data broker at the time, and which I can't even link to from here as it's a blacklisted external link at Wikipedia.

Have any books or other reliable sources ever printed this image identifying it as Nutt? Or is it one of those photos that gets attached to a historical name on a website, and sticks? There are many copies online, but I haven't yet found any that offer a convincing origin for it. --Belbury (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply