Talk:Emma Corrin

Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2025

Emma Corrin is not with Rami Malek anymore. They're not together, they broke up 2A01:E0A:BEC:88B0:189C:6097:8588:2BF3 (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Per the reversion by @Sock, the people magazine source you provided last time was considered unreliable. WP:PEOPLEMAG also notes the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented with a stronger source. Which I hadn't seen when I added it from your last request Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 20:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure the reverting editor read the People article correctly. The "unnamed source" in that article told People the status of the couple in August 2023, not about their recent (alleged) breakup. Funcrunch (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Unless I'm reading something wrong in the article, there's no source for the breakup either aside from People themselves, and WP:PEOPLEMAG would still apply. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 20:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure, I'm not disagreeing with that. A reliably sourced statement from Corrin would definitely be preferable. Funcrunch (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Only other source I'm finding that isn't user generated or using People as their source is this WP:DAILYMAIL article, so I'm gonna agree with you and Sock that we should probably wait for a better source. (That said I'm awful at finding sources, so someone else may have better luck) Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 20:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2025

“They” should be changed to “she”. 2A02:8308:A193:5F00:5DBD:BE40:8979:9D22 (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: See the note in the second sentence along with the source. Nubzor [T][C] 20:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2025

Add Category:Non-binary voice actors. 69.158.125.44 (talk) 06:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: The article does not describe Corrin as a voice actor or mention any voice acting roles by them. (talk) 07:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

The filmography section mentions Corrin's voice acting role of Thessaly in the audio drama of The Sandman. 69.158.125.44 (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Slomo666 (talk) 17:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done anyways. diff i changed My mind. If this decision was bad, it would not really be I that I caused harm, since the other categories were there already. Slomo666 (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Emma Corrin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Crp74 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Dizzycheekchewer (talk · contribs) 14:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I will do this GA review. I should have a full review up within the next day or so. No major immediate insight, but I would check through for wikilinking (some stuff like Orlando in the lead, University of Cambridge in the first section isn't WLd).Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Many thanks @Dizzycheekchewer. Much appreciated. Looking forward to working with you on the review. Crp74 (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

First, nice job on this article overall. It's pretty fully formed and I left with no unanswered questions about the subject, which is my personal metric for a good article. Now the actual Good Article metrics:

• Well-written
  • Prose is good, straightforward with no issues.
  • No issues with the 5 MOS.
  • It's not required for the GA, but I would see about paraphrasing some of the very many quotes. Even some of the critic quotes could be translated to standard prose, per MOS:QUOTEPOV (i.e. 'IndieWire's Kate Erbland wrote that the adaptation gave Corrin “one of the best roles of their [career]”," could be ..."that the adaptation represented a career highlight for Corrin" or something a bit snazzier) and some of her own quotes about herself could likewise receive a bit of cleanup (the section "Corrin has said that gendered awards categories are a “difficult question” and “there is more work to do” as existing categories are “not inclusive enough” " may need one or two quotes, but you also could summarize some of the feeling expressed with paraphrasing, like "Corrin has said that gendered categories are complicated as they are "not inclusive enough."" That's a rough draft of course, but my concern is mainly that the short staccato quotes kind of take the reader out and then drop them back in, where a paraphrase + a quote will make the viewpoint a little clearer).
• Verifiable
  • Leaving at question for now as I'll do a full spot-check of the sourcing, but no red flags here. Did a spotcheck of approximately half the sources, including a portion of the podcasts. Everything matches up, so changing to green here.
  • Having said that, lots of podcasts/interviews and not all necessary. I would substitute reliable secondary sources as much as possible.
  • No copyvio issues (13.1 percent on earwig), no NOR issues, inline cites are good for GA.
• Broad in its coverage
  • Mostly good, but a couple crufty bits (like a dual-description of each of her roles—"hacker and amateur sleuth" or "a nightclub dancer and aspiring actress"), which detract from the overall picture a little bit. Not bad enough to hold it back though.
• Neutral
  • Generally a good balance, but I'd be wary and try to fix a couple patches where it steers toward a more promotional tone (e.g. "Beyond the world of acting" or "they were drawn to the role"). It's overall not bad, but I'd do some pruning.
• Stable
  • Only a handful of edits in the past month, none particularly crazy. No edit wars or major upheaval.
• Illustrated
  • I see the profile photo was just changed a couple days ago. While the new one has a dynamic edge, the clarity/timeliness of the older one is better, so I'd recommend a switch back.
  • I think it could do with at least one more photo. Looking at the wikicommons (), there's only the one other photo. But it's fine as it stands, especially with the slim selection.

Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

@Crp74 Okay, everything seems in order. Let me know if you have any questions/concerns or I'll close this as GA pass. Nice work! Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Huge thanks @Dizzycheekchewer for your review. I've tried to take on many of your comments including changing the picture, removing the two instances of fancruft and paraphrasing many of the short quotations. I'll work on your other comments soon. Thanks again, Crp74 (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.