Talk:Emily Pitcher
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 11 days ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 10 July 2026
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emily Pitcher article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on December 27, 2025. The result of the discussion was delete. |
| On 10 July 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Emily Pitcher to SonderingEmily. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 10 July 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Withdrawn by nom. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:39, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Emily Pitcher → SonderingEmily – Original mover moved the page without a broad discussion taken place. Requesting it to move back to SonderingEmily Wikiman (Talk) 19:59, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per December 2025 AFD. After the AFD, the article was subsequently brought to AFC, declined twice, and then posted to mainspace anyway. This has no business being on Wikipedia. 162 etc. (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- @162 etc. Not a deletion discussion btw Wikiman (Talk) 23:20, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Wikiman2230: Why did you post an article to mainspace after it was deleted at AFD and then declined for AFC twice? That does not appear to be a good-faith way to go about this. 162 etc. (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- I also note that you made this edit with the summary "Removed per Emily's request". Is there a WP:COI we need to know about? 162 etc. (talk) 20:02, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Wikiman2230 to answer 162 etc.'s question. Giovanni Potage (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- I DMed her and informed her about the article. She said that the site was her old one, so I took it down per her request Wikiman (Talk) 20:06, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Wikiman2230 to answer 162 etc.'s question. Giovanni Potage (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- I also note that you made this edit with the summary "Removed per Emily's request". Is there a WP:COI we need to know about? 162 etc. (talk) 20:02, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Wikiman2230: Why did you post an article to mainspace after it was deleted at AFD and then declined for AFC twice? That does not appear to be a good-faith way to go about this. 162 etc. (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose: In all WP:RS coverage, she is referred to her real name. Giovanni Potage (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Giovanni Potage Ok then. Someone close the discussion Wikiman (Talk) 00:14, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- You are allowed to withdraw the request in this situation. –Maltazarian ᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 17:43, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Giovanni Potage Ok then. Someone close the discussion Wikiman (Talk) 00:14, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose and Keep, real name here seems appropriate, and keeping the page per GNG seems the way to go after new sources being added. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.