Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology
This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography
==[untitled]==rating
EEA Copyright notice:
Unless otherwise indicated, the information available from this site is within the public domain. Public domain information on the EEA web pages may be downloaded free of charge, and reproduced provided the source is acknowledged.
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I see that a merger with Natura 2000 has been proposed. I'm against it because the Emerald Network is bigger than the Natura 2000 network. The Emerald Network is part of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats or Bern Convention. The Emerald Network is an ecological network in the 39 member states of the Council of Europe, together with the European Union, Monaco, Burkina Faso, Morocco, Tunisia and Senegal. The Natura 2000 network is an ecological network in the teritorry of the European Union. Because the EU and its member states also signed the Bern Convention its Natura 2000 network is a part of the Emerald Network. So I'm against a merger, because it are two different networks of two different organisations. Peter Maas12:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
T.Wang_ex_Cheng.JPG){kind=small}
