Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Comment: Thank you for tidying up the source notation, and I can see the submitting editor has done a lot of work on this article since August.Unfortunately I think this may have gone too far in the other direction. See WP:REFBOMB and the essay WP:THREE. Having a line of 9 references (and several of three) is unhelpful to the reader. The focus here is on good quality sources to either establish notability or to verify statements in the article, not on lots of them. It's also less important what the subject says, in terms of sourcing, more important about what other people are saying about him. In terms of notability, I am assuming the submitting editor is leaning on WP:ACADEMIC criteria number 1, if none of the other 7 applies. If so, then merely being cited isn't enough, ideally we would want a review or critique of his work. I imagine that will exist for ROSE, rather than just cited. Or perhaps a profile of his academic career by an independent source. ChrysGalley (talk) 21:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I can't see any sign that he passes WP:NPROF or WP:GNG Have any of his books been reviewed in reliable, independent publications (e.g. newspapers and academic journals)? If so, please add these book reviews as references. Please also see WP:REFB for instructions on converting your references from bare URLs to full citations. MCE89 (talk) 07:55, 17 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Comment: Notability under WP:NACADEMIC criteria 1 - reviews of ROSE model ChrysGalley (talk) 08:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)