Talk:Elimination Chamber/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

Review comments

Pre-review

Reading the review done about four months ago, there are some things that have not been fixed, chiefly for example: "The lead really fails to summarize the article. Per WP:LEAD it certainly needs to be longer, but even with a bit of common sense, you don't get a feel for the article such is its paucity." lead is still lacking length and information."

Write out some more for the lead and I will have that reviewed.

Lead

Of what there is so far, I think you should put "WWE" after World Wrestling Entertainment up there, so then you can abbreviate it for the first sentence of History section.

History

There are a few words that are linked more than once here or in the lead, and only the first mention of the word should be linked:

• World Wrestling Entertainment
• World Championship Wrestling
• Raw
• WWE Brand Extension (pipe-linked as "2006")
• WWE Elimination Chamber

Match

Abbreviate the unit conversions, e.g. 36 feet (11 m) to 36 ft (11 m)

Spell out numbers whole numbers less than 10, except for dates

Again, there are words overlinked:

• Raw
• SmackDown
• ECW
• steel cage
• Hell in a Cell

References

Reference #3 is simply a URL, add the details from the source

Reference #5 has an incorrect date

Summary

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I now believe that this article passes the GA criteria. If you wish to take this to the FAC, I highly recommend that you first add alt text to the images and spell out numbers less than 10. Anyway, great job and good luck on the WikiCup.--12george1 (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)