Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b188719d8d96e

Jump to content

Talk:Element collecting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Double sharp in topic Regarding how many elements you can collect

Regarding how many elements you can collect

[edit]

In principle, with an unlimited budget and unlimited license to break laws, you can get a macroscopic sample of all of the first 99 (or perhaps 100) elements, except astatine and francium. In practice, most element collectors are sensible enough to stop at 83 (the stable 81, plus thorium and uranium), perhaps cheating with very impure samples of the other ones to complete the sequence from atomic number 1 to 92. The usual way to get around the astatine problem, for example, is to take a chunk of uranium ore, since astatine will be in the decay chain of uranium. Double sharp (talk) 04:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

...or, more simply put, most element collectors only bother trying to collect the primordial elements (not counting Pu, whose primordial status is disputed and is of very questionable legality to possess). Double sharp (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
The one addition that the most dedicated – i.e. Theodore Gray – have tried is technetium, because of its very long half-life, legality to possess (unlike the actinides that aren't thorium and uranium), and decay to clean stability at molybdenum or ruthenium instead of the cascade of gamma emitters that thorium passes through on its way to stable lead. Double sharp (talk) 15:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply