Talk:Electric Ink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Shall we move the article?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As obnoxious as our mutual friend may be, he has a point of sorts. Should we move the article to Electric Ink (radio series) and leave the original title for the company? There are precedents for company articles as long as they don't rise to the level of advertising.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Djdaedalus (talk • contribs)

According to google, there are a bunch of tattoo studios called Electric Ink, too. None of these companies appear to be notable enough for an article of their own, and until that happens there is no need to disambiguate this article's title with a clarifying phrase in brackets. This is covered in the guidelines on article titles, here: WP:PRECISE. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 07:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good work. I vote for status quo as well. Maybe our friend will get his privileges back, and follow the advice he's already been given. Djdaedalus (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Electric Ink

Shall we move the article?