Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is Ashlar a type of natural geological sandstone obtained from rock formations or, as Wikipedia suggests, is it a sandstone rock formed into a suitable shape for building purposes?
This may seem be making a fine distinction but the word appears to be used in this article in a different sense to that in the Wikipedia Ashlar article.Stuffed cat (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
According to the Oxford Dictionary of Architecture an ashlar is a "class of masonry consisting of blocks of accurately dressed, cut squared and finished stone..." or "a large clay-based block larger than a brick". Ashlar in this sense is Quader in German. However, in the case of Elbe Sandstone the term Quader is also used to describe the different geological sandstone layers from which presumably ashlars were cut. So I would say it is a local usage of the term as a proper name for the Elbe Sandstone strata. I've amended the section title to reduce the risk of confusion, though. --Bermicourt (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
