Talk:Edward Forst

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edward Forst/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ElijahPepe (talk · contribs) 00:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 15:11, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This nomination has been waiting around long enough, so I am going to undertake the review. I rearranged one sentence that was bothering me. If it's inappropriate, you can restore the old version with justification. Please allow me a short time to review the sources. This is review one of two to fulfill my pledge in return for the review of white-sided jackrabbit. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

@Reconrabbit: All comments have been handled. The Public Records Index is a primary source and I removed it. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:04, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your attention to this, I've recovered enough from my time away to get back to editing. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 21:33, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Prose

• Forst attended a summit in Utah hosted by Mitt Romney, who outlined his political future It's unclear what "outlined his political future" means, also could be vague which person "his" is referring to.
• Define Massey Knakal (realty firm?).
• Copyright: I'm only seeing matches on long administrative position titles and headlines. Y

References

• Why not provide a link to RMG Acquisition Corp. III? I understand why the Public Records Index isn't linked.
• Since you have more experience in this area: do you consider the PRI to be a "published source" for the sake of WP:V?
• Layout: Straightforward.

Spot checking

Reviewing 10 sources. Numbering is based on this revision. I don't have access to WSJ right now and have to avoid those.

• [1] Y
• [6] Y I see it states he worked for Bankers Trust for >12 years before starting at Goldman, but not the year he started fixed
• [10] Y
• [14] Y
• [16] Y
• [17] Y
• [19] Y
• [24] Y
• [28] Y
• [31] Y

Scope

• Broad: The subject's early life and career are detailed, as the sources allow.
• Narrow: Overly specific details that would be WP:UNDUE are omitted in this BLP.

Stability

• Neutrality: The subject is presented neutrally without obvious bent towards any particular perspective. Very dry. Y
• Edit warring: Article is stable. Revisions that have been reverted are with cause or have been corrected. Y

Images

• Free/Fair use: Public domain images only.
• Relevance: Infobox image is used for identification.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.