Talk:Edgeout Records
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Chubbles in topic Reliable Sources
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Reliable Sources
[edit]According to several sources online, PR NEWSWIRE is a very reliable and generic source that does not give "puff" pieces. Many sources on this page match WP:NOTPROMO on not giving excess praise or information about the source. Please be more specific when deleting information, as it is unusual to delete information that is actually appropriate. Embellishing is a common issue with record labels, but all of the information listed matches the rules and regulations Wikipedia upholds. Curlyhairedmaterialgworl (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:PRNEWSWIRE. This source is generally unreliable, as it is regurgitating press releases coming directly from the record label itself. It is not an independent news outlet. Do you work for Edgeout Records or receive payment on their behalf for editing here? Chubbles (talk) 19:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the link. No, I do not work for nor do I have any affiliation with the record label. Do you work for Edgeout Records or receive payment on their behalf for editing here? Curlyhairedmaterialgworl (talk) 02:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- They'd certainly be asking for their money back if they were. Chubbles (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the link. No, I do not work for nor do I have any affiliation with the record label. Do you work for Edgeout Records or receive payment on their behalf for editing here? Curlyhairedmaterialgworl (talk) 02:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)