Talk:Ed Policy

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ed Policy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 23:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: OceanGunfish (talk · contribs) 23:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article! I am trying to gain more experience as a GAN reviewer so please let me know if anything I do is nonstandard. I do see from your talk page that you are on vacation through July 1 so I will not anticipate seeing any updates until after that date.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Y Is his academic history important enough to include in the second sentence of the lead? I believe so, as his career is an executive, so that fact that he has a BA and a JD is fairly relevant. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Y In the "Early life" section, consider revising the location of his high school from the state (Ohio) to the city (Youngstown). Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Y In the "Early career" section, remove the link to California per MOS:GEOLINK. Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Y There is an unnecessary comma in the first sentence of the of the "Team executive" section. Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Reference spot-checks: 7, 8, 9, 15, 22, 25 OK Y In the "Early life" section (and in the lead and infobox), he is credited with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree cited to Ref 6. Ref 6 says he received a degree in accounting and does not mention a BBA. Good catch. Fixed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig score is 37.9%, indicating Violation unlikely. It mostly picks up his various job titles as well as a couple passages that are properly quoted.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No image. Hopefully we can get one after he takes his next, higher-profile position.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Just a few little things to take a look at. Thank you for your contributions. OceanGunfish (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

• OceanGunfish, I think I have addressed everything. Thanks for the review! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

  Passed OceanGunfish (talk) 18:12, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 01:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Ed Policy and his father Carmen Policy have both served as presidents of National Football League teams?

• Source: Carmen Policy and Ed Policy

• • Reviewed: Mohamed Lazhari
  • Comment: Note, he does not become president until July 13. I will add a new source stating definitively that he has now become president of the Packers.

Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 67 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC).

• Special date request: July 13 Policy becomes president of the Green Bay Packers that day. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:28, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
• Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Newly-promoted GA. Looks good. Approved for July 13. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)