Talk:Economy of Venezuela

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economy of Venezuela article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Pérez, Carlos Andrés, gobiernos de. Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela de la Fundación Polar

Venezuela Top‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Number of Internet subscribers has increased tenfold"

Such vague statemets have no plays in enciclopedias. I mean, what are the two points that bound the time which has seen the tenfold increase? They are not mentioned it seems.

This article doesn't meet basic objectivity standards expected from an encyclopedia

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are sections of this article that read more like a piece of antichavist propaganda than anything anyone should read in a serious encyclopedia. Besides the blatant lack of objectivity and the biased tone of the writing, I also spotted several outright falsehoods that are easily verifiable. For the time being I'm flagging the article for NPOV while I contact an administrator. 147.161.103.248 (talk) 11:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't work that way. Administrators do not decide how articles are written, editors do. Your objections are too vague to flag the article. I say that because there is no way of knowing if your objections had been met.

If you want to improve the article, you need to provide specific objections. For example, you say there are falsehoods in the article. Can you point them out? TFD (talk) 11:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply