Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2270d9d498f0acb

Jump to content

Talk:Ecological network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by MiltonMendonca in topic complexity is not linkage density...

Mutualistic/Non-trophic

[edit]

Mutualistic interactions are a specific type of non-trophic interactions. I do not know of any non-trophic ecological networks that are not mutualistic networks (but please advise me if I am wrong). Therefore, it makes sense to use the more specific term, since using "non-trophic" is a loss of information. Shinobaren (talk) 19:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

complexity is not linkage density...

[edit]

Hi there: I would like to argue that the bit about complexity in ecological networks is imprecise. It states that "Complexity (linkage density): the average number of links per species. Explaining the observed high levels of complexity in ecosystems[1] has been one of the main challenges and motivations for ecological network analysis, since early theory predicted that complexity should lead to instability". I am OK with including network complexity as a real and important problem, but perhaps toward the end of the article and not related to linkage density only. Complexity in networks might relate to feedback loops, spontaneous order, robustness, forms of emergent and hierachical organization, perhaps it should be included in a section about ecological network patterns such as modularity and nestedness. Linkage density is a simple descriptor of networks and does not define how complex it is or appears to be. --MiltonMendonca (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply