Talk:Ecclesiastes

Untitled

Can I add some information to this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apokryphos (talk • contribs) 00:29, 2003 December 17 (UTC)

I've added information to this. ~apokryphos aka Francis G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.210.244 (talk) 22:05, 2003 December 17 (UTC)

Kohelet

Is there a need for Kohelet redirected to Ecclesiastes ? Gangleri 06:03, 2004 Sep 27 (UTC)

Probably. It's the standard spelling in German and at least an uncommon alternative in English. I'm just going to do it. Mpolo 07:02, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)

Troublesome document

Ecclesiastes has been a very confusing and troublesome book in the bible. I'll look into some better info and see what I dig up. I do recall the Catholic church having problems with it and the asumption that Solomon was the author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaseh1030 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 2006 July 30 (UTC)

Coogan

@TA: yes, Coogan does say that. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Subjectivity

The line that states “ It is a controversial, unorthodox, and subversive book.” seems to be a matter of opinion. Should this remain in the article? OrganizationVII (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

We can use WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. But it is a widely shared opinion, since many questioned why it got included in the canon. See the body of the article. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

WP:CITELEAD

Lead section follows the body. Hence my revert.

The TA does not have the right to cancel information which is WP:V to 10 WP:RS.

Can there be a more unorthodox teaching than absurdism? Yet Ecclesiastes seems to teach absurdism. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:58, 15 April 2026 (UTC)