Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a267b17cabecf54b

Jump to content

Talk:Ebolavirus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-34245-77 in topic #Treatment section needs a rewrite - USA-centric

Wiki Education assignment: Virology 2022

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nikkicalvert, Blynnski34 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: FeyUnlocked, Boom4life.

— Assignment last updated by FloeEdge (talk) 04:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Accuracy and definitions

[edit]

How about adapting the article to one in line with the definition of case-fatality risk and using this term when that concept is intended, rather than using e.g. case fatality rate and mortality rate? From the article on case-fatality risk I understand that it concerns a risk, not a rate.Redav (talk) 10:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

#Treatment section needs a rewrite - USA-centric

[edit]

Believe it or not America/Americans, the world does not depend on you for authority on MOST things, and similarly, the FDA is not an appropriate SINGLE-SOURCE, for this section's addressing of treatment. Nor would ANY single-source, ofc.

The more-than-embarrassing 1 million dead from the coronavirus-denial childish pandering, more than demonstrated that the USA should not be depended-upon, for any kind of medical authority. That point might SEEM UNRELATED? but it is RECENT, CURRENT, and contexual-to the legal and of-questions-of-RELIABILITY, context,.. of what quality to expect from the country and/or org.s / people-of,.. for an indefinate amount of time, IMO.

It might sound ludicrously broad, but it is not any kind of attempt at saying a low-quality should be expected of-everything, of-anything,.. but just a singular temporally-indefinate point, about EXCEPTION at least at the moment when it comes to -medical authority / reliability.

How about the WHO, or other ACTUALLY GLOBAL, bodies. ~2026-34245-77 (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply