Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Earth-bathing(final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archivedon 15 December 2025. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
I've listed this article for peer review because this article represents an idea of society before certain medical discoveries such as certain viewed articles.
@2550 69 11hne I think this is fair. I acknowledge the contentious nature of pseudoscience. For the record, I will say I am not treating the topic as factual but just consolidating the sources into a retrospective on an outdated and obscure historical fad. I am open to criticism, perhaps if anyone thinks the article's written in a way that is biased in favor of the practice being described. -- Alexander Patmos (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@2550 69 11hne (and others) I draftified this article for being composed of insufficiently reviewed LLM generated text. See the draft talk page for an example. I think this renders the peer review request invalid at this time. If this article is pushed back to mainspace I will notify you so the peer review can be re-requested. Sorry for the inconvenience! NicheSports (talk) 02:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I draftified this article due to a high-probability of insufficiently-reviewed LLM-generated content. Here is an example: In medical-historical retrospectives the practice is frequently cited as an example of the excesses of Georgian medical showmanship and the overlap of health, entertainment, and spectacle. shows signs of LLM-generated content and is sourced only to , which does not support these claims. A quick scan of the article reveals other potential source-to-text integrity issues. The article also has an unreliable source as a reference. NicheSports (talk) 02:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
@NicheSports The example you provided about showmanship was actually sloppy citing on my part. Rather than "", I meant to cite "". I apologize for not placing my citations more carefully.
The claim that medical-historical retrospectives cite earth-bathing as an excess of Georgian showmanship is more-so original research and is my assessment of overall perception based on the sources. I apologize for including something that was not directly included in the source. Going forward, everything I include within articles will be directly derived from a corresponding source and cited (per Wikipedia:Verifiability), while also being paraphrased so as to not infringe.
If you still have concerns about source-to-text integrity issues, please review my rewritten article (here: Draft:Earth-bathing). I have ensured that everything I wrote and consolidated can be traced back to and found within a specific source. Nothing is fabricated.
