Talk:Ear print analysis

Addition of new subheadings (to be added)

• Description
• History
• FearID
• Limitations
• Use in court
• Future possibilities

Ciararryan (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Sources to be used for new information

Alberink, I., Ruifrok, A. (2007). Performance of the FearID earprint identification system. Forensic Science International, 166(2-3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.001

Arcautea.M and Granell. J University of Valladolid Spain (2006) Ear Print as an Identification Method. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 57(7), 329-32. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c949/8bc14eacb0ecb5f6480e07c036271d9ca649.pdf

Champod, I., Evett, I., Kuchler, B. (2001). Earmarks as evidence: a critical review. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(6), 1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15146J

Swift, B., Rutty, G. (2003). The human ear: its role in forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2002251

Meijerman, L., Sholl, S., De Conti, F., Giacon, M., van Der Lugt, C., Drusini, A., Maat, G. (2004). Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints. Forensic Science International, 140(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.024

Meijerman, L., Thean, A., Maat, G. (2005). Earprints in forensic investigations. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 1(4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:4:247

Junod, S., Pasquier, J., Champod, C. (2012). The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons. Forensic Science International, 222(1-3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.021 Ciararryan (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Citation Needed

This sentence was in the description but needs a source.

Ear print analysis is considered to be more economical than DNA profiling, and is considered to be reliable because it is unlikely a technician would leave an ear print behind in a crime scene.

It was deleted from page.

Ciararryan (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)