Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a3ff1adf7b6f90ce

Jump to content

Talk:EU Sovereign Tech Fund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Klbrain in topic Feedback from New Page Review process

A bit early

[edit]

Hi @Mgifford, thanks for reaching out! I see @Smasongarrison noted not being sure about whether this article meets WP:ORG. It's an interesting subject, but this article seems a bit early to me - some coverage in secondary sources but not a whole lot. I'd suggest covering the topic in a more condensed form as a new section at OpenForum Europe, and redirecting this article there. Could also add a sentence or two on GitHub and Sovereign Tech Agency. Then, if the proposal gets approved (or gets a lot more coverage), it'll be a good time to revert the redirect and rebuild the dedicated article. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I do appreciate this feedback. This is a quickly moving space, and is bigger than just OpenForum Europe. It has been raised in the UN, but definitely more references are required. There should be more soon, and thanks for this feedback. Mgifford (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The article looks like advocacy for the proposal at this point.
As a reader, I'm left wondering about its relationship to larger efforts. To support readers of this article, it looks like technological sovereignty needs to reflect recent developments in the EU more clearly and comprehensively. For example, I'm seeing this article from March , this article from June, this one from October - it looks like a push for open source is just one part of a much larger push.
What are relevant competing proposals? What are oppositions or concerns? This article has a critical perspective that seems useful to integrate. Dreamyshade (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Good recommendation about that article. That's a useful critique. Thanks! Mgifford (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for responding to the comments of other editors with constructive improvements. Watch out for citation template errors, as they can point to places for improvement. While some of the sources are from blogs, there are sufficient reliable sources to establish notability.

Klbrain (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply