Talk:eMachines eOne

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Result

Did Apple win the suit?

This article seems to have

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It seems this article seems to have anti- PC part atthe end of the main paragraph.

"However, the eOne lacked the PowerPC G3 RISC processor, which was considerably more powerful than the CISC-based Celeron. The eOne also did not feature Mac OS 9, which was far less susceptible to malware than Windows 98 and Windows ME."

I think this should just be changed to say that it isn't a Mac and uses a Celeron instead of a G3 or something like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dashwarts (talk • contribs) 02:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Celeron is and has always been a i686 (Pentium Pro derived) design. Therefor it is _not_ a CISC (unlike the original Pentium (1)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.42.125 (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:eMachines eOne

Result

This article seems to have