Talk:ECyD

Contraveries related to ECyD

I had to clean up the criticism section based on three things. 1. Many of the contraversies have nothing to do with ECyD so just link to to the LC contraversies page. 2. The critiques, although accessed recently, are all historical by 5+ years and from the same period. 3. All three articles are from one source: do we need to cite all three then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPSchneiderLC (talk • contribs) 10:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I went to the articels today and only one of three even mentions "ECYD." Therefore I deleted the other two as references and appropriately shortened that section.MPSchneiderLC 16:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPSchneiderLC (talk • contribs)

Old Satges

I made a chart to summarize both the new and old stages. I will now delete most of the old stages section in a seperate edit so that the new and old take up about equal space. If something thinsk it is necessary to keep more detail of the past, please explain why. MPSchneiderLC 12:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPSchneiderLC (talk • contribs)

ReGAIN

I posted a question at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_136#Negative_ex-whatever_sources and the response was that self-published, disgruntled ex-member things give undue weight to a certain position (cf. WP:UNDUE). If those things can be found in reliable sources, then they can be added. >> Jesus Loves You! M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemus • feci) 14:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)