Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23e23ea5896845c

Jump to content

Talk:E8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 212.251.82.178 in topic Proposed move to "E8 theory"

Proposed move to "E8 theory"

[edit]

At Talk:An_Exceptionally_Simple_Theory_of_Everything#Requested_move some editors apparently not acquainted with E8 in other contexts are proposing to move that article to "E8 theory", which I feel would be ambiguous and giving Garrett Lisi's theory excessive weight. Please come and help discuss this. --JWB (talk) 03:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your feeling is shared by many people, especially physicists. The use of E8 as a unification group in grand unified theories in Physics has a long history, dating at least as back as 1979 and 1980 with the pionneering papers of Baaklini (Physics Letters B 91, 376 (1980)) and Bars & Gunaydin (Physics Review Letters 45, 859 (1980)), and later with the E8*E8 theory of Schwartz and Witten. Discussions on E8 omitting to refer the work of those Physicists do not add the proper scientific weight to the fora concerned.(212.251.82.178 (talk) 10:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC))Reply