Talk:Dynamoterror
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Fanboyphilosopher in topic Is it valid?
| Dynamoterror (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 17 April 2022. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Is it valid?
[edit]Changyu Yun has recently considered Dynamoterror a nomen dubium, but he plagiarized the paper. Magnatyrannus (talk) 02:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- [citation needed]--Kevmin § 02:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the consensus is on his Dynamoterror paper, but a significant degree of skepticism should be provided towards any of Chan-gyu Yun's work. He has done a lot of questionable actions which cause concern for his ethical and scientific reliability. His Teihivenator paper was published in a predatory journal and apparently plagiarized in part from Mickey Mortimer's blog, and his affiliations list a fictional institution (“Vertebrate Paleontological Institute of Incheon”) to obscure the fact that he is an independent researcher. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)