Talk:Dynamic mode decomposition

Untitled

I am unfamiliar with the subjects decomposed in these examples. If these decompositions are included in a publication, I encourage the author to cite them. Otherwise, I will replace them with published examples from Rowley and Schmid. Hasselmann's paper is not a sufficient source for this entire article. I intend to replace the description section with the notation employed by Peter Schmid. Diyphysics (talk) 02:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

"This article has multiple issues" - since 2012?

Comparing the version from 2012 to the current version shows that the issues regarding citations surely are resolved, and the demonstrated increased use of this decomposition at least convinces me that it does not contain "original research". Shouldn't the warning be removed? 129.242.158.79 (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Not sure if the talk page is supposed to contain endorsements, but this is the clearest description of DMD that I have seen, including the original articles and multiple reviews since. Whoever did it, did a great job and the banner should have been taken down a long time ago. Unamuno16 (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)