Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25d017a78e01ec6

Jump to content

Talk:Duratrans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Plain Text

Amen to the other comments here. This article is primarily about a very specific, and I'd bet relatively low volume, use of the material. Which are there more of in the world: news sets, or bus stops? But the whole article is about sets. It's like having the whole article on gold talk specifically about plating the clips on a MontBlanc pen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.158.7.202 (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


I find the definition to be very narrow. Duratrans is a material to start with, THEN a stage design element. I believe the last sentence of the article should be the first.


Duratrans is a Kodak product, which is a backlit film material. This page only refers to one use of Duratrans. Shouldn't the main point of this page be about the Kodak material, and show it's use in TV sets as an example, rather than the other way around? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.197.87 (talk) 03:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  I concur. Duratrans is a trademarked product name, a fact this article leads with. Therefore the first letter should be capitalized in all instances, except perhaps for the mention in quotes that the term is sometimes used generically. See also this FAQ: [1] The name ends with an s as a contraction of transparent. It is not a plural, so any reference to "duratrans are" is invalid. Plain Text (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply