Talk:Durability

Reversion

I took out 'Durable Concrete' addition due to Advertisement policies. As far as the comment, I selected the wrong button in Twinkle, and I appologize! --Kingofslackrs (Talk Edits) 09:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Misleading

The sentence from this article "Because there is no objective measure of durability for clothing, price has become an important indicator." is seemingly in contradiction with what its citation says (From the abstract: "...however, results indicate that retail price cannot be used to predict the durability of garments.").

I assume when it says "price has become an important indicator" the Wikipedia article means that price is frequently used by people to estimate durability, despite there being no real correlation between the two.

The way it is currently written, it can be mistakenly read as suggesting that price is a valid estimate of how durable clothing is. That's how I interpreted it for the first few minutes until I checked its citation's abstract.

I'm not really sure what to do to fix this, since I've never edited Wikipedia before, and I don't think I've looked into this enough to make sure that whatever I would be changing about the Wikipedia article would be precisely true. Hence why I'm creating this Talk post. Ddeevviiaanntt (talk) 06:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)