Talk:Duma arson attack

This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

This is a very false, unfair and dishonest article. Actually: 1. There is no evidence of the "guilt" of Ben Uliel and his comrade and no voluntary confessions and testimonies. There are only psychological and physical torture knocked out and very dubious "confessions," and the words of the investigators that Ben Uliel allegedly "knew what only the killer could know" (in fact, he could easily find out all this from the investigators themselves), and there are not even such statements about the second convict. 2. The authors of the article almost completely concealed the torture used against the accused, despite the fact that this was reported a lot in the Israeli media, including in English (!). Obviously, in this way they tried to create a false impression of "reliability" of the knocked out "confessions" and "guilt" of the accused. 3. Most likely the arson was committed by any Arab(s) of Duma village. It is known that there were conflicts and violent clashes between different Hamulas (Arab family clans) at that time. I urge users with the right to edit this article to quickly edit it in the direction of the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:A041:E954:A200:5D62:2017:2145:C4AA (talk) 12:31, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Kahanist allegation

The page says Bayit Yehudi leader Naftali Bennett, commenting on the flood of emails from people claiming they would no longer vote for his party because of his defense of the Shin Bet's Jewish Agency, which is investigating the crime, said Ben-Gvir, the suspects' Kahanist attorney

but there is no WP:RS to support that Ben-Gvir is a Kahanist attorney.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 September 2020

On 14 September 2020, Ben-Uliel was sentenced to life imprisonment by an Israeli court.source. 175.195.155.5 (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done – Thjarkur (talk) 20:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment

Hello, I read your article and I found inaccuracies. First in the video I watched from Haaretz, it's not GuestS who stabed a picture, but one guest dancing with one picture.

Secondly this sentence is allusive :

" Such scenes are reported to be typical of many such weddings".

I don't think there is SUCH weddings. And I don't know what it means... What type of weddings?

Finally here is a reference about the trial of the accomplice of the murderer, to add in the article :

https://www.timesofisrael.com/teen-accomplice-to-deadly-duma-arson-attack-on-palestinian-family-enters-prison/

Please take note of my comment. --Frank Shuma (talk) 01:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

I need to supplement this comment as I agree wholeheartedly but think a point was missed. To the editors, you need to do a better job of confirming the accuracy of the quotes in this article. Neither of the quoted sources in any way, shape or form indicate that "Such scenes are reported to be typical of many such weddings." This is antisemitism pure and simple. The articles indicate that dozens such scenes occur at weddings on a monthly basis. Considering the thousands of weddings performed each month, this accounts for a fraction of a per cent, a far cry from "typical." Simply checking the sources and confirming that the source in actuality says what it is purported to say is quite literally the lease that should be done before erroneous and hateful "facts" like these are allowed to be published. Wikipedia, do better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.143.178 (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Please replace “refers to” with “is”

In accordance with WP:REFERSTO. 82.36.70.45 (talk) 17:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I modified the opening so as not to bold a descriptive title. nableezy - 17:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)