Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b42357965d319

Jump to content

Talk:Dual norm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 174.3.155.181 in topic good sources

good sources

[edit]


hi guys,

trying to improve this section but having trouble finding good sources. Rudin's functional analysis (chapter 4) isn't bad, but it's more about Banach spaces and dual spaces.

it's possible one could "cobble together" a definition from Rudin's discussion, but i find it lacking. i tried finding a copy of Pavel Aleksandrov's combinatorial topology (volume three seems really really nifty), to no avail.

wondering if anyone here has some good recommendations for books touching on functional analysis and duality? @Zfeinst: (never thought i'd see this day, did you? lollll): got any good recommendations?

any advice would be great. right now this section is poorly sourced, and if i wasn't familiar with the concept (i learned them through Fenchel conjugates), i would have put a request for deletion (exaggerating, sorta).

174.3.155.181 (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A first source that I have open in front of me right now is "Infinite Dimensional Analysis" by Aliprantis and Border (3rd Ed., Section 6.3: p. 230-232). Once I get to my office I might be able to give more references, as I'll have more books to glance at. Also I agree that this page needs a lot of improvement. Would not have even thought to look here if it weren't for you @174.3.155.181:. I'd like to think we can have a difference of opinion on some topics while still having respect and discourse. Zfeinst (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Zfeinst: thanks man. i'll check it out soon and hopefully i can bounce around from there using any references in the back of the book. if you want to make some edits you can go ahead. thanks again man. 174.3.155.181 (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply