Talk:Dual loyalty

Original research

"Dual loyalty" is a term sometimes applied by those demonstrating religious prejudice to describe Muslims living in Western countries, especially during periods of heightened tensions in the so-called Clash of Civilization, such as September 11, 2001 or during the Danish Cartoon Controversy of 2005-2006. The exact nature of these accusations are vague, and even those who level the accusation have a difficult time exactly explaining what the supposed "other loyalty" of the accused party actually is. [original research?] (See: http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back603.html)

This section of text does not have a definitive tone when saying accusations are vague, the editor who added this appears to be editing from an original research standpoint. Netscott 08:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Agreed... that's some sloppy writing, there. After some very unpleasant (and frankly, abusive) dialogue, this article received a complete overhaul, in order to (over?)sensitively deal with issues of immigration, ethnicity and claims of "dual loyalty." Any suggestions are more than welcome.... perhaps remove the last sentence? Spir 21:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dual loyalty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060417080312/http://www.cis.org:80/articles/2001/paper20/renshon1812.html to http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/paper20/renshon1812.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090822075313/http://www.counterpunch.org:80/christison09062004.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09062004.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060217071330/http://www.cis.org:80/articles/2003/back603.html to http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back603.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051113013422/http://texnews.com:80/1998/opinion/chavez0408.html to http://texnews.com/1998/opinion/chavez0408.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203220945/http://www.hinduismtoday.com:80/archives/2000/2/2000-2-07.shtml to http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/2000/2/2000-2-07.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Congressional Black Caucus dual loyalty

• What about the piece that stated the CBC was strident about South Africa, yet silent or supportive about black African dictators? Would that not be dual loyalty? USN1977 (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)