Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25511932e5cc6fa

Jump to content

Talk:Dream Productions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SleepDeprivedGinger in topic Complete the "reception" section

Riley's Age

[edit]

Riley's bio (copied from Inside Out 2) states her to be 13 years old. While Riley indeed is 13 in said movie, this show takes place a year before the movie. That being said, Riley should be stated as 12 years old, not 13. To further prove my point, in this show, Riley can be shown wearing her hair down (like she did in the first movie) and as seen in Inside Out 2, Riley is 13 when she starts wearing her hair in a ponytail. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:B000:A639:964:4B79 (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The edit has been made, thank you for pointing this out. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No problem. 👌🏻 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:F59F:53A3:6AAD:2B2C (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dream Productions poster

[edit]

Has everyone who update the new official poster in this page? TheMultiverseStudios (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Walt Disney Animation Studios

[edit]

Dream Productions was supposed to be produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios. 187.255.220.3 (talk) 02:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you provide a source for this? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Complete the "reception" section

[edit]

Hi, I'm here to see if the "Reception" section could be expanded, as it's rather bland, with only Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores. Therefore, I'd prefer to add the following professional reviews: The Times Empire The Guardian The Boston Globe The A.V. Club IndieWire Slate The Daily Beast Collider and Screen Rant. I'm asking user @SleepDeprivedGinger: to fix the problem. 181.78.209.198 (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Why me specifically? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@SleepDeprivedGinger: I called you because you've contributed a lot to the article and improved it. But I understand if you don't want to do that; in that case, I'll have to call other users like @Higher Further Faster:, @Movieknower59:, and @YoungForever:. So, tell me what you think of this proposal. 181.78.209.199 (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's not a bad idea, as it is a good idea to showcase more reviews to demonstrate the series' critical response. It's not that I wouldn't want to do it, it's just that I don't see why you can't do it. You brought up the idea, why not help out yourself? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply