Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
A fact from Doux commerce appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December2019(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Enlightenment concept of doux commerce suggests that commerce civilizes people and can even eliminate violence?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
the lede starts "Doux commerce (lit. gentle commerce or soft commerce)"; I think this is selectively in error. Doux also means "sweet", and I think it's the translation intended. The idea is that "commerce itself has sweet fruits", and not that "gentle commerce should be advocated in favor of harsh commerce". Also, in languages where soft/gentle/and sweet are the same words, they are the same word; it's only in interpreting to English where you need to be selective among the concepts. In the time of Montesquieu, commerce was heavily regulated and required licensing from the King; it wouldn't have been a discussion of the nuances of markets. 207.237.14.175 (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
