Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a234c34a9f9c18aa

Jump to content

Talk:Doubleday

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by ArthananWarcraft in topic "Doubleday (disambig)" listed at Redirects for discussion

Moving Doubleday (publisher) to Doubleday

[edit]

I know it's already been moved this way before but if you look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Doubleday there are a *lot* of links, and I think it's a safe bet that the vast majority of them are meant for Doubleday (publisher). There aren't any other major uses for the word Doubleday other than as a last name. I'd do it myself, but I can't move this page to a disambig page as there's already one with a redirect here... so maybe an admin could do it? I'm not sure what to do; hopefully someone who knows more will see this. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seven years later and this still isn't settled, or at least there is no comment here indicating that it is settled? Is the Doubleday publishing company the primary topic here? I had never heard of these people listed under the Doubleday surname (four of which are associated with the company). When I look at the page links I see the following:
The publishing company article has 3 times more links than the only other contender, Abner Doubleday, the famous Civil War general and disputed creator of baseball. Does this make the company the clear primary topic, or should there be a whole order of magnitude distance between the candidates? ——Rich jj (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Another thought: Is it likely that when a visitor wants to access Abner Doubleday's article that they would just type in "Doubleday"? This is the most convincing point for me, since all the other topics have first and last names and are not only called "Doubleday". I may just go ahead and change the article names now. ——Rich jj (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
So I guess Doubleday (disambiguation) already exists and Doubleday (publisher) was created as a move from Doubleday back in 2006. I'm not allowed to move Doubleday to Doubleday (disambiguation), which would allow me to move Doubleday (publisher) to Doubleday. This is supposed to go to an administrator through Wikipedia:Requested moves. ——Rich jj (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Doubleday (disambig)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Doubleday (disambig) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 31 § Doubleday (disambig) until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply