Talk:Dornier P 256
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Trekphiler in topic Untitled
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of the Dornier P 256 page was merged into Dornier Do 335 on 31 January 2021, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
Untitled
[edit]Every single sentence doesn't need to be cited. Once per paragraph is enough if the same source is being referenced throughout. I'm a bit concerned about the copyright of this text. I couldn't find any policy where text from http://plane.spottingworld.com/ is copyright-free. Is this the case?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Since I've had {{fact}} tags attached where I've cited at the end of sentences, I tend to fn every detail, now. Overkill? Maybe. It does avoid ill-informed tagging.
- PSW was designed as a wiki, like WP, but aviation-specific. Have a word with User:Tim Trent, admin over there, if there's a problem. There shouldn't be, tho; I've swapped a few pages from there to here (actually, created them more/less similtaneously) with no issues. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 22:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you feel more comfortable footnoting every sentence, that's your call, but at least consolidate the footnotes with a name to prevent unnecessary duplication.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'd happily consolidate 'em, but I can't always get the syntax right when somebody else has done it to begin with. :( TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 01:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- There you go. All done!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work. You really don't want to see what that would've looked like if I'd tried it... ;p TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 03:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty simple really, just gotta pay attention to the key elements. I'll leave the next exercise to you, young Jedi.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I think I'll go over to the dark side, instead. ;p Neil Shaw Seat 58 05:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty simple really, just gotta pay attention to the key elements. I'll leave the next exercise to you, young Jedi.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work. You really don't want to see what that would've looked like if I'd tried it... ;p TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 03:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- There you go. All done!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'd happily consolidate 'em, but I can't always get the syntax right when somebody else has done it to begin with. :( TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 01:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you feel more comfortable footnoting every sentence, that's your call, but at least consolidate the footnotes with a name to prevent unnecessary duplication.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class aviation pages
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Redirect-Class military history pages
- Redirect-Class military aviation pages
- Military aviation task force articles
- Redirect-Class European military history pages
- European military history task force articles
- Redirect-Class German military history pages
- German military history task force articles
- Redirect-Class World War II pages
- World War II task force articles
- Redirect-Class Germany pages
- NA-importance Germany pages
- WikiProject Germany articles



