Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25127769de4f689

Jump to content

Talk:Donavan Freberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Grahams in topic SCTV?

creative

[edit]

"Creative" is a job title?, a noun? Spike2021 (talk) 00:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Photographer?

[edit]

76.89.155.241 is most insistent that Freberg is a photographer of note. Where's the evidence for this? -- Hoary (talk) 08:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mr. Freberg assisted the famous photographer Harry Langdon from 2002-2004 before branching off on his own and shooting as a freelance photographer. Inside the liner notes for "Stan Freberg Presents The USA Volume 2", Donavan is also credited as a photographer. It seems that in addition to being a voice over talent on the album, he also shot many of the photos for the liner notes and supplemental materials. He also shot many pictures for the booklet inside Stan Freberg's box set, "Tip Of The Freberg".
BTW, he is also credited as a director on IMDB, which you might want to add to his Wikipedia profile. Hope my input helps!
--Eddie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.103.56.66 (talk) 00:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Donavan's photography portfolio can be viewed at http://donavanfreberg.wordpress.com/.

76.89.155.241 (talk) 07:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

SCTV?

[edit]

"parodied on Saturday Night Live[citation needed] and SCTV[citation needed], "

SCTV ended in 1984, and this article claims that the advertising campaign ran from 1988-1993. I don't see how both of these can be true. --grahams (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply