Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22721cf7e03c465

Jump to content

Talk:Doherty amplifier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by WhaleFarm in topic Possible plagiarism

I just created this new page on the Doherty amplifier. Definitely could use expansion on it, also on the William H. Doherty inventor's page. This was an important RF amplifier in the early days of radio broadcasting, and I think it deserves its own page. Erzahler (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


This is an important amplifier - it is the mainstream of today's designs still and for 5G. But the page does not currently clearly explain the basic principle of the amplifier: it immediately dives into specific implementations. A link to current dumping would help ? David.J.Greaves (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Possible plagiarism

[edit]

I checked this article for possible copyright violations, and a violation check indicates a suspected violation. The indicated source is an article in a reputable professional magazine:

  • Pengelly, Raymond; Fager, Christopher; Özen, Mustafa (February 2016). "Doherty's Legacy". IEEE Microwave Magazine. pp. 41–5.

The IEEE article is dated after the additions here, and it does not mention Wikipedia. In my view the wording in these articles is too close and and suggests plagiarism, either in our article or in the IEEE article or in both, see Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Possible explanations are:

  • The authors of the IEEE article may have plagiarised this Wikipedia article. The IEEE Microwave Magazine has a high reputation, and this seems unlikely.
  • The duplicated text may have come from a common source, possibly one of the sources cited in this article (which I can't find online).
  • The Wikipedia editor may be one of the authors of the IEEE article. This does not resolve this issue as the uncredited use of Wikipedia content is not allowed, see Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content.

Peterh5322, you added some of this content, please clarify its source. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I worte new sections for all but "Successor broadcast developments." Should be no plagairism in the new material. Somebody should go work on the remaining, it is also unsourced, and needs to find product data. WhaleFarm (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I believe I have replaced all possible problem areas with fresh-written text. It is missing much of the prodcut number info now, but better sourced. WhaleFarm (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

product descriptions

[edit]

There are no references for all of the products called out, probably needs a simple table. WhaleFarm (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply