Talk:Doctrinal background of Zen
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Text or other creative content from this version of Chinese Chán was copied or moved into Doctrinal background of Zen with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
{{Wikiproject China|Importance=Top}}
Created page
[edit]Created page, in response to proposal at Talk:Zen#A Suggestion to shorten the Zen-article. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doctrinal background of Zen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130316112305/http://www.skb.or.kr/down/papers/063.pdf to http://www.skb.or.kr/down/papers/063.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111212192016/http://www.blia.org/english/publications/booklet/booklet.htm to http://www.blia.org/english/publications/booklet/booklet.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Polarities
[edit]@Foristslow: this section is about a number of polarities, as defined by an assortment of specialized scholars. None of them mentions yin-yang or wu wei; you have just randomly added some sources to make a point which is not treated in this section. Please stick to what's already sourced, by McRae, an excellent source, which links these dualities to neo-Confucianism.. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 09:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thankyou Joshua, if it is Neo-Confucian as is its predecessor Confucianism philosophy they are built on the principles of yin and yang, so infact you have substantiated my claim and also please clarify how the sources are less relevant than the sources on page that are over two decades old. Something that you may need to know is new research and clarity can come to light and things move on even in acidemia, I don't understand your point. Please explain so I can be clear thankyou. Foristslow (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)