Talk:Docomo Pacific

early comment

It is obivious that the person who nominated this article for deletion just singled it out after he just looked at it for no appearant reason. I don't think he has been to the other articles similar to this one. I think what he is doing is a waste of time. If he is going to delete this, he should delete the other small cable/broadband companies Robert Moore 23:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Doc^g 20:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 12 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

---

DoCoMo Pacific → DOCOMO PACIFIC – DOCOMO PACIFIC’s website and every other mention of this phone carrier I see online has the name capitalized, just like its Japanese parent company NTT DOCOMO. (Example: the page title of the website: https://www.docomopacific.com/) Cameronszachta (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

• Strong oppose: Per MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM / WP:ALLCAPS. Also see NTT Docomo and the previous discussion at Talk:NTT Docomo#Requested move 24 November 2018. The recent anonymous IP changes within the article to switch to all-caps should also be reverted. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose move and snowclose. Obvious MOS:TM case. O.N.R. ^(talk) 06:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

If you go on their website, they have a new logo.

and it's a different logo than what's on the article 24.152.144.132 (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)