Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d927eff7decfa

Jump to content

Talk:Djerring Trail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Fork99 in topic WP:NOTGUIDE?

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was article merged. Doggo375 (talk) 06:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


I propose to merge Station Trail into Djerring Trail. I think that the content in the Station Trail article is outdated, but some content is still relavent to the Djerring Trail page, and as such, can easily be explained in the context of the Djerring Trail page, and the Djerring Trail article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the Station Trail page will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Doggo375 (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Station Trail has been superseded by the Djerring Trail, so yes, the Station trail page should be merged or deleted. Tashel (talk) 03:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

WP:NOTGUIDE?

[edit]

This article seems like a travel guide to me, seeing as much of the article is unsourced (I also added a maintenance tag). I'm considering merging this into the Level Crossing Removal Project article as an alternative to deletion, seeing as the trail was created as part of that project. JuniperChill (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I haven't done enough research regarding sourcing, but if the citations in the article are the extent of the sources out there, I would support a merge. Also note a ton of similar/other Victorian rail trail articles are also quite poorly sourced and are basically a travel guide. Not too long ago, many of them addressed the reader as "you" contrary to WP:YOU, I can't remember if I tried to fix it or if I just placed maintenance tags. Fork99 (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply