Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a256a6389e383337

Jump to content

Talk:Divergence theorem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Markpeletier in topic n=3 versus general n

Licensing

[edit]

This article is based on the GFDL article from PlanetMath at http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Divergence.html

Generalization

[edit]

5.95.187.184 (talk)I would like to recall your attention about this section, in particular about the first subsection: Multiple dimensions. In fact, I think that this one would actually benefit in being inserted as a sub-subsection of the generalization to the Riemaniann Manifold, for which the equation is: , where is for the riemaniann volume form of the riemannian Manifolds, namely, and (the last one considered as a submanifold of with the inclusion as embedding), is a vector field, and is the versor normal field defined on . Considered this equation, the subsection Multiple dimensions is just a corollary, with considered as a submanifold of

Divergence theorem

[edit]

vect 41.79.120.17 (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vector calcuis

[edit]

divergence theorem 41.79.120.17 (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

n=3 versus general n

[edit]

The current description following `Mathematical statement' is inconsistent: it starts by assuming that is a subset of , but then states the identity in notation that presupposes that : the three integrals on the left and the two integrals on the right are specific for dimension three. Proposal: state first the general case, and then explain that in three space dimensions the integrals are more commonly formatted as ... (etc.). Markpeletier (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply