Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ditrichites article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
Ditrichites is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
A fact from Ditrichites appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June2026(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that it was 41 years between the first Ditrichites moss description and the genus being reported in amber fossils (pictured)?
... that the extinct moss Ditrichites has been found as compression fossils and in amber (pictured)?
Source: Kuc 1974: "Twenty-eight slabs with fossil mosses obtained"
Tan et al 2025:Intro "Ditrichites aristatus sp. nov. (Dicranales s.l.), based on 34 whole plants and 11 fragments embedded in 13 pieces of Kachin amber"
ALT1: ... that soil particles found with one species of Ditrichites moss (pictured) indicates ground level habitat?
Source: Tan et al 2025: "Lower parts of plants often attached by soil. The attachment of plants to soil (Figure 4A–C) suggests that this fossil species was terrestrial."
ALT2: ... that it was 41 years between the first Ditrichites moss description and the genus being reported in amber fossils (pictured)?
Source: Kuc 1974 First species
Frahm & Gröhn 2015: Baltic amber species described
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. Hook facts are interesting with a preference for ALT0. Image confirmed to be CC-BY. Copyvio tool finds some close paraphrasing with a personal gems website. However, given that the same material has been at Burmese amber since before the site's inception, it appears to be a case of them copying us. —Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Nikkimaria: None of the instances you are pointing to in this article qualify as egregious instances of MOS:SOB. In a 9742 character long article you are asserting that 4 instances of two or three links is a SOB issue, its not. Also I have twice now noted that "-era" is grammatically and scientifically wrong wording for geological time groups. --Kevmin§14:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please don't remove tags without addressing issues.
In a 9742 character long article you are asserting that 4 instances of two or three links is a SOB issue, its not. Not sure the basis for this claim. One such linking pattern would be a SOB issue; 5+ in a short article is a significant one. Feel free to propose alternative rephrasings. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:55, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Article is new enough and long enough. Hook facts are interesting with a preference for ALT0. Image confirmed to be CC-BY. Copyvio tool finds some close paraphrasing with a personal gems website. However, given that the same material has been at Burmese amber since before the site's inception, it appears to be a case of them copying us. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)