Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26238a5fc173401

Jump to content

Talk:Distrontium ruthenate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by InterstellarGamer12321 in topic Confusion with other strontium ruthenate

Confusion with other strontium ruthenate

[edit]

I'd like to add an article on the compound SrRuO3, which is confusingly also called strontium ruthenate. I think that the properties of these compounds are different enough to warrant separate articles, but I'm not sure how to distinguish the names. Please advise La2O3 (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree: "strontium ruthenate" could be Sr2RuO4 or SrRuO3 or Sr3Ru2O7... Amongst those, I guess that SrRuO3 is most commonly studied/used whereas Sr2RuO4 might have the most spectacular properties among the different compounds. I would suggest having the chemical formulae as title for different pages and then one "strontium ruthenate" disambiguation page that has the links to the different pages.HBook (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
If so, how do you properly format the formulae? It's not like you can put <sub> tags on titles or format it incorrectly like SrRuO3. 141Pr 21:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub>}} can be used to format the title. But I think fuller names should be used rather than formula for the titles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think we should use strontium ruthenate as a page for all formulae it covers, as each compound itself would not necessarily be notable enough for its own article. We could talk about the differences between formulae in the article itself to stop any confusion. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply