Talk:Disseisor
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Recommend Removal?
[edit]The article refers to an obscure (academic) term relating to right of possession. The etymology comes from the same root as "seize" but then so does "possession. So its more to do with possessory rights.
The term is used in common (english) law and is cited in Magna Carta 1215, but since this was written in Medieval Latin... questionably translated.
Either way in common law in UK, US and Canada.. "adverse possession" is the less archaic and so a redirect to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession might be more appropriate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topoli-onpoli-canpoli (talk • contribs) 22:49, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Could we have some information about which country/countries this term is in use in? Is it in general use in USA, Canada, UK, where? Thanks. Berek (talk) 20:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Adverse Pocession
[edit]I have been using a parsal of land for about 40 years without documentation. How do I establish that there has been no objection over all these years and I should now have rights to this property? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.64.222 (talk) 00:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)