Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23bab216b64a9fe

Jump to content

Talk:Disney Adventure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Trappist the monk in topic unexplained revert


Looks like the ship will look different then originally announced. old: https://www.meyerwerft.de/de/presse/presse_detail/meyer_gruppe_baut_kreuzfahrtschiff_fuer_dcl_mit_methanol_antrieb.jsp new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lQ6YuOJEBY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uXMN5Dqj7E https://disneyconnect.com/dcl-press/release/disney-cruise-line-creating-ultimate-vacation-destination-onboard-the-disney-adventure-sailing-from-singapore-in-2025/ https://disneyparksblog.com/dcl/come-aboard-disney-cruise-lines-all-new-adventure-at-sea/  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E7:B706:49DC:F963:79EF:BEEE:44C1 (talk) 04:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Due to mer et marine, there were planned ten units originally. https://www.meretmarine.com/fr/construction-navale/le-paquebot-geant-disney-adventure-ex-global-dream-sort-du-hall-de-construction-de-wismar Initialement nommé Global Dream, ce navire, qui devait être le premier d’une série devant comprendre jusqu’à dix unités, avait été commandé par le groupe asiatique Genting Hong Kong, d’abord pour sa filiale Star Cruises, avant que le bateau soit réattribué à Dream Cruises, une branche plus récente du conglomérat. 8after the Video) 2003:E7:B70E:22E2:A593:F42B:A397:63DA (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

unexplained revert

[edit]

My edit has been reverted without explanation. Similarly, my edit at Disney Wish has also been reverted without explanation. Editor Magical Golden Whip: please provide a rationale for your reverts (here and here) of my edits.

Trappist the monk (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

WP:Not Broken and unexplained changes to the info box. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:35, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Editor Magical Golden Whip: are you sure about that? WP:Not Broken is a redirect to Wikipedia:Redirect § Do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken. Neither of my edits 'fixed' any redirects. Perhaps you meant the essay Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it? But that doesn't apply to my edits either because the primary purpose of my edits was to fix the infoboxen which will become broken; see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 30 § Template:Infobox ship begin.
Trappist the monk (talk) 13:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply