Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22080cd3ee61ae0

Jump to content

Talk:Disk density

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 217.246.63.8 in topic "Single" vs. "Double" Density

"Single" vs. "Double" Density

[edit]

This article is written in a way that seems to help perpetuate the myth that there's a difference between "single" and "double" density diskettes ("Single density (SD or 1D) describes the first generation of floppy disks...")

Only two types of floppy disk media were commonly used for 8" and 5.25" diskettes: the original media (usually called "1D" for single-sided and "2D" or "2DD" for double-sided media here in Japan) and high density (HD). The "single" and "double" density systems use exactly the same media and drives and differ only in the controller. The "quad density" term to indicate twice as many tracks is one I've not seen before and is not even used consistently on this page: in the table 5.25" 40- and 80-track diskettes are referred to as "DD" and "QD" but the 3.5" 40- and 80-track diskettes are both referred to as "DD."

Unless someone's got a better idea, I think the best place to start fixing this might be to rewrite the 8" and 5.25" sections to distinguish the media used (the diskette), wider vs. narrower write heads (the drive; 5.25" only) and encoding (the controller), remove the "QD" designation entirely, and merge columns in the table to make it clear that all 8" and 5.25" non-HD media are are the same, and also that all 3.5" sub-HD media are the same.

Cjs (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've seen the designation QD for 80-track, 250kbit/s MFM recording on 5,25" disks in some places, so I'd rather have that term stay on this page in some way (not necessarily as separate column in the table, though). I've never seen QD used for 3,5" media, mainly because in Europe, 40-track 3,5" formats never were in widespread use. 217.246.63.8 (talk) 10:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

"High-density" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect High-density. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 22#High-density until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. LaundryPizza03 (d) 18:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply