Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a237697afda6d96e

Jump to content

Talk:Disaster Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 47.20.64.130 in topic Defaced?

This allowed the family control over the image's distribution

[edit]

That doesn't make sense. There's no mechanism by which NFTs allow control over the image's distribution. The fact that the photo in question is shown in this very article should be proof that this is objectively nonsense. They also didn't "sell the photo" in any meaningful sense if they retained copyright on it. They sold something, but that something is more like buying a company's stock, rater than buying the company itself. In any case, there is no arguing that this stunt does not affect how and when the photo is circulating on various platforms. If anything it's become more uncontrollable via the Streisand effect due to an increase in popularity. Just because there's a source claiming something doesn't mean it should be stated as a fact like this when it's obviously bs.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.243.127.130 (talk) 21:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


Yeah, I agree. I don't see how this allowed them to control the image's distribution. The source cited for that claim is locked behind a paywall so I can't read it. I'm removing that sentence. Nog642 (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This needs its own wiki page

[edit]

Unbelievable. Its just a picture. The nerve of some people to waste time on this!

2600:6C56:6408:71:35A1:8FEA:80AA:4958 (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)anonymousReply

Defaced?

[edit]

Not actually related to Orson Welles. 47.20.64.130 (talk) 02:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply