Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a270efd31a0c51f9

Jump to content

Talk:Diocese of Amiens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Vicedomino in topic Regnal numbers for bishops

Flag of French Republic removed

[edit]


I removed the French Republic flag icon from the Infobox, in accordance with several sections of WP:ICON; specifically (quoting),

  • Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many....
  • Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity. [Amiens existed before there was a France, then was Frankish, Merovingian, and Carolingian, but then it was part of the realm of the Kings of France (whose flag was a large golden fleur-de-lys on a white background), not the French Republic.]....
  • Do not rewrite history. Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure [including some bishops], event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag.

--Vicedomino (talk) 04:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Regnal numbers for bishops

[edit]


Please do not cut-and-paste old lists of bishops which have regnal numbers after the personal name, e.g. John III., Pierre V. First of all, the number is not part of a person's name. Additionally, numbering might change if a new early bishop with that name is discovered. Thirdly, if a person is transferred to a new appointment, his number might not be the same in his new appointment; or, for that matter, if he is transferred from a previous diocese, the same problem would occur. Anyone who makes a new article page with one of the numbers in it (through inadvertence) might create severe problems with the Wikipedia. This old practice is especially unnecessary if a bishop has a surname.

--Vicedomino (talk) 07:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply