Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a469592a9a40bd4a

Jump to content

Talk:Dimethylmercury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by DMacks in topic 2026 MIT incident

Question

[edit]

where or how does this dimethyl mercury originate or form?

I think it may be formed only artificially. However, I believe methyl mercury is the result of bacterial metabolism or other interaction with elemental mercury; perhaps dimethyly Hg is also formed in this way.--Jrm2007 (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

How does it kill? Why is only a couple microliters on the skin enough? I want more details. :) - furrykef (Talk at me) 13:52, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

See the entry on dimethylmercury at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning Simxp 18:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

NFPA 704 Diamond

[edit]

I think there should be a NFPA 704 diamond in the article. Evan Robidoux 08:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think it is too rare to have an official rating (you won't find a tanker truck hauling a load of it). An estimated rating is: 4-3-0 Splarka (rant) 01:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oxidation state of Mercury

[edit]

What oxidation state is Mercury in di-methyl-mercury, my hunch is 2+ am i right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.34.47 (talk) 05:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mechanism

[edit]

What exactly is the toxicity mechanism? All the article says is that it's "toxic". -Rolypolyman (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Production and usage

[edit]

Where is it produced and what are its usages?

I've heard it described used in the new long life light bulbs. is that a fact?

No, that's just metallic (elemental) Mercury, which while toxic, is much less toxic than Dimethyl Mercury. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeylawn (talk • contribs) 02:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

A Valid Question

[edit]

From what I can gather, this is not a naturally occurring chemical, meaning it (at one point) had to be manufactured or invented in a lab somewhere. So my question is..why in God's name would anyone make something like this? What was this chemical's intended purpose, or was it created by accident? It seems to be a perfect killer in almost every single way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.213.134 (talk) 00:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Ask instead at the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science‎. Plasmic Physics (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Neoprene effectiveness

[edit]

"Dimethylmercury passes through latex, PVC, butyl, and neoprene within seconds, and is very quickly absorbed through the skin. Much safety equipment used to prevent exposure to other chemicals does not provide protection from dimethylmercury."

No citation is given for the above quote. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199806043382305 , Delayed Cerebellar Disease and Death after Accidental Exposure to Dimethylmercury, linked from the article on Karen Wetterhahn, recommends using neoprene gloves as a layer of protection.

72.200.205.38 (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

You're more than welcome to edit the article. Brycehughes (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Potential Use

[edit]

There was once a proposal to use Dimetnylmercury as the fuel in a liquid-fueled rocket engine. (Dr.) John D. Clark relates the story in his book "Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants", 1972, Rutgers University Press, ISBN 0-8135-0725-1, pages 177-178. 129.42.208.182 (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)DaveReply

"Striking" feature?

[edit]

I'm weakening the "most striking feature" language, it's very subjective in tone, and not cited anywhere. 24.22.157.155 (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dimethylmercury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

After rejection. Very profitable and high quality food. From "the Food Банк". The discussion in English subsided, dried up, withered, embarrassed and lost interest.

  Need to add the power. Owing to . Some from Wikipedia - user's. Secretly. Semi-legal. 1 kg tetra-sodium EDTA bought from abroad. And, bored at the continent. In "Chambr 4". The possibility of using Di-Metril-Mercury is discussed. Well. The di-methyl mercury manufacturing mechanism is of vital importance. How do they want to manufacture the substrate in "Chamber 4"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.244.180.59 (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The case Karen Wetterhahn, a professor of chemistry at Dartmouth College. Proposed as an ezyclopedic example.

[edit]

So . Firstly. In case, I'm not mistaken. First. The talk was. About deadly METHYL mercury poisoning.

As a result. Secondly . Is Di-Metrhyl Mercury - Poisoning More Harmful? Compared to methyl mercury poisoning. Considering the mercury - "Promile" in blood. Well. 10 mg Hg / liter (respective 5mg/L.) Methyl mercury. Are ...195.244.180.59 (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


2026 MIT incident

[edit]

May not have been an actual exposure. Initial blood test is negative and its not clear that Dimethylmercury was actualy made:

https://emergency.mit.net/

©Geni (talk) 03:08, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yup, it's what the gratuate student themself says and what some sources say, but nothing says it's confirmed and some are tentative at best. I updated the article to say "student...reporting being exposed". Based on previous cases of exposure, the timeline of test-results rising can be quite extended (though it's not our place to WP:SYNTH to the case at hand either way). DMacks (talk) 03:14, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply