Talk:Dimensions CM
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Tedickey in topic Sources
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Sources
[edit]These are primary sources: , , while this is a weak source (I would ignore it), this appears to be an advertisement posing as a review (again, ignore it), and this is a possible source (flawed by not really being a review, but at least lacking the obvious flaws of the other sources). You need several of that to establish notability. TEDickey (talk) 00:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Added few more sources.
- And also references to books (references section might be soon bigger than article :), need to work more on contents). Alex.Thunder.UA (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've declined it since there is an assertion of notability but offhand this might be better off redirected to the main article for the company. Not all products really need to have a page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. To add more about the notability - Dimensions CM is one of the oldest revision control systems, which is still actively developed and used by many well known companies (like Lockheed Martin, European Space Agency, Fujitsu Business Communication Systems and many others). Alex.Thunder.UA (talk) 07:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Any statement, on Wikipedia, needs a reliable source to start a discussion. Talk page comments are not a reliable source of information, nor are they verifiable TEDickey (talk) 09:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)