Talk:Digital comparator

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Inconsistent notation?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I know just enough to be dangerous, so I might be completely wrong here. It seems to me that this article is inconsistent in its notation. Sometimes it uses $\cdot$ to indicate the AND function, and sometimes it uses juxtaposition to indicate AND. But then it also sometimes uses juxtaposition to show a sequence of bits. So, am I dense, or should AND always be indicated by $\cdot$ ? Earendur (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Digital comparator

Inconsistent notation?