Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a262d5e0cb640ecd

Jump to content

Talk:Digital cinema

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by GA-RT-22 in topic Effect on distribution

Wiki Education assignment: History and Theory of New Media

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Queenones87 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jnolan27 (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lead image makes no sense

[edit]

The lead image shows some seats in a movie theater with the caption "Stadium seating rows closer to digital cinema screens offer significantly more immersive experiences." What does that have to do with digital cinema? More immersive than what? Film? How? I can't find anything in the article that discusses this. GA-RT-22 (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Effect on distribution

[edit]

The citation given for the statement "To print an 80-minute feature film can cost US$1,500 to $2,500" doesn't seem to say anything of the sort. The closest thing I can see in that article to that figure is an anecdote about how much large format splicers cost, which is a completely different thing. 103.240.114.196 (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is a bit about the cost of prints toward the end. She says she needed to raise $30,000 to make a print for a festival in Berlin. But it's unclear how much she actually spent, and that also included sound and a negative. And this was for one (or maybe three) prints, I'm sure the big time distributors are paying less when they order a hundred prints at a time. I think the best we could do with that source is say "thousands of dollars" but even that is a stretch. Probably best to find a new source. GA-RT-22 (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply